Showing posts with label East of Eden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label East of Eden. Show all posts

Thursday, March 31, 2016

East of Eden Drafting: Take Two

Okay friends, this post needs a huge disclaimer: this draft is a complete and utter MESS. I had a weird headache and I was still mentally drafting (my bad for not planning ahead a little better...) so this is awful. I'm actually embarrassed to post it, haha. But please know that if the middle doesn't make any sense, it's not supposed to yet--I'm working on it :)

The concept of “timshel” is very valid and well-supported in this epic novel. It is the character of Lee, the Chinese immigrant who raises Adam’s twin boys Aron and Caleb, who goes by “Cal”. During his years of research on the Bible, Lee discovers that in the original Hebrew, the word given with God’s commands is “timshel,” meaning “thou mayest.” Lee then states that “[this] might be the most important word in the world. That says the way is open. That throws it right back on a man” to choose his own actions rather than being forced to do anything. (301) This is an empowering idea, as this allows all people to act freely, but it is also a responsibility and accountability for one’s own actions. No one is forced to do anything, so they must live with the consequences of whatever they choose to do. This is shown very poignantly in the final meeting of Cathy, then Kate, and her husband Adam. When Adam finds her in her prostitution house, Kate believes that, just as before, she can use manipulation to gain power of her former husband. But Adam chose to confront her and his feelings of love for her, and in doing so, he saw her as she truly was. He could not be fooled anymore and he was free to act. He even “laughed because he knew that [she didn’t matter]” to him anymore. (323) Parallel to his choices are Kate’s very purposeful actions. She chose again and again to lash out and hurt Adam as much as she could with her blackmail, her lies and affair, and her sexuality. But Adam realizes and declares to her that she “hate[s] the good in [others] that [she] can’t get at,” which is “something [that she] can’t understand.” (321) Yet even though she, as a sociopath, cannot understand goodness the way that others can, she still puts for real effort to ruin others. That is not just her nature—it is her conscious decision. She becomes bound by her horrible, selfish choices when she loses power over Adam and therefore can no longer make choices for them both in the situation.
            Yet there is a paradox, for even though every person has the ability to choose for themselves, they each have a unique drive that causes them to choose the things that they do. There is something that motivates each person that causes them to act differently from others, and this thing can be defining. When Adam is forced to think again about Cathy, he must choose how to respond. Lee tells him that even though he is facing a choice, “[his] course is drawn. What [he] will do is written—written in every breath [he’s] ever taken” (376). Human thought and habits are both consistent and persistent. It is difficult to break free of our usual thoughts processes and perceptions.
            Steinbeck seems to take this a step further as he suggests that our nurturing styles and interactions are influenced by our nature. As Adam thought back to his relationship with Cathy, he asked Samuel if she had truly even been beautiful like he had always thought. Samuel replied that “to [him] she was because [he] built her” (260). Adam has a pure heart and a good soul, and he saw these qualities in Cathy even though they were not there at all. He reflected himself onto her. Cathy did the same with her customers at her prostitution house; she insisted on reducing every man into an animal by seeing and exploiting only their flaws.
            Steinbeck does realize, however, that nature can be improved upon or ruined by one’s nurture. The character Samuel argues that although “You can’t make a race horse of a pig,” a person “can make a very fast pig” (260). He feels strongly that one’s children “will be what you expect of them.” There is a responsibility given to parents to encourage the very best in their children, if for no reason but to draw on the better parts of their nature.
            Embracing the best parts of one’s nature can be a very healthy process. Near the beginning of the story, the reader learns that Cathy began her rampage early in her life, when she realized that she took pleasure in other’s pain. When she was a teenager, she did many horrible things, including locking her parents and burning down the house with them inside. This is symbolic of Cathy rejecting her nurture and only embracing her own nature. Because she only chose the most evil parts of herself,

            But it is a person’s right to choose that course, whatever their reasoning, that Steinbeck so highly praises. He declares that he would “fight for” every person’s right to make their own decisions because “the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world.”  This is the thing that, above anything else, Steinbeck believes and wants others to know—that every person can and should make their own choices and should also rejoice in the fact that they can. He seems to find strength in the idea that we make our choices free of outside influences, even our nurture, as this takes away the most precious “freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected.” In this way we come to rely more on ourselves and our personal progress as we journey through life rather than be shaped by the circumstances and factors outside of our control. For Steinbeck, as shown in this epic novel, this is the crowning glory of mankind—to be one’s own person and make their own decisions for themselves.

Thursday, March 24, 2016

East of Eden Writing

Next Steps and Draft

So, here we go. I will be using my annotated bibliography and some of the other sources that I've looked at, even just as references to keep me on-track. I have an idea of what paragraphs I want to write and a little bit of what I want to say. My goal: get my preliminary thoughts on paper. It will be a more skeletal draft than I'm used to writing, but it's a start.

Update
So I ended up with less sources and more thoughts, which I thought was fine for a super messy, preliminary write-up. I think I did get down my most basic outline, which was the goal. Again, sorry that it's so choppy:

            The concept of “timshel” is very valid and well-supported in this epic novel. It is the character of Lee, the Chinese immigrant who raises Adam’s twin boys Aron and Caleb, who goes by “Cal”. During his years of research on the Bible, Lee discovers that in the original Hebrew, the word given with God’s commands is “timshel,” meaning “thou mayest.” Lee then states that “[this] might be the most important word in the world. That says the way is open. That throws it right back on a man” to choose his own actions rather than being forced to do anything. (301) This is an empowering idea, as this allows all people to act freely, but it is also a responsibility and accountability for one’s own actions. No one is forced to do anything, so they must live with the consequences of whatever they choose to do. This is shown very poignantly in the final meeting of Cathy, then Kate, and her husband Adam. When Adam finds her in her prostitution house, Kate believes that, just as before, she can use manipulation to gain power of her former husband. But Adam chose to confront her and his feelings of love for her, and in doing so, he saw her as she truly was. He could not be fooled anymore and he was free to act. He even “laughed because he knew that [she didn’t matter]” to him anymore. (323) Parallel to his choices are Kate’s very purposeful actions. She chose again and again to lash out and hurt Adam as much as she could with her blackmail, her lies and affair, and her sexuality. But Adam realizes and declares to her that she “hate[s] the good in [others] that [she] can’t get at,” which is “something [that she] can’t understand.” (321) Yet even though she, as a sociopath, cannot understand goodness the way that others can, she still puts for real effort to ruin others. That is not just her nature—it is her conscious decision. She becomes bound by her horrible, selfish choices when she loses power over Adam and therefore can no longer make choices for them both in the situation.
            Yet there is a paradox, for even though every person has the ability to choose for themselves, they each have a unique drive that causes them to choose the things that they do. There is something that motivates each person that causes them to act differently from others, and this thing can be defining. When Adam is forced to think again about Cathy, he must choose how to respond. Lee tells him that even though he is facing a choice, “[his] course is drawn. What [he] will do is written—written in every breath [he’s] ever taken” (376). Human thought and habits are both consistent and persistent. It is difficult to break free of our usual thoughts processes and perceptions.

            But it is a person’s right to choose that course, whatever their reasoning, that Steinbeck so highly praises. He declares that he would “fight for” every person’s right to make their own decisions because “the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world.”  This is the thing that, above anything else, Steinbeck believes and wants others to know—that every person can and should make their own choices and should also rejoice in the fact that they can. He seems to find strength in the idea that we make our choices free of outside influences, even our nurture, as this takes away the most precious “freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected.” In this way we come to rely more on ourselves and our personal progress as we journey through life rather than be shaped by the circumstances and factors outside of our control. For Steinbeck, as shown in this epic novel, this is the crowning glory of mankind—to be one’s own person and make their own decisions for themselves.

Saturday, March 19, 2016

Symposium: Killer Presentations

I was able to attend the symposium on Friday morning in one the lecture rooms with the Criterion Winners. I was able to hear two of the presentations. The first (and I'm embarrassed to say that I wasn't paying enough attention at the beginning to catch her name) gave a fascinating lecture about the use of murder in the work of Edgar Allen Poe, Alfred Hitchcock, and Thomas De Quincy. De Quincy was influential in the ideas of Poe and Hitchcock, and all three were intrigued and even full of admiration for the art of killing, as they "saw murder as an artistic opportunity." The speaker talked about how murder is used in their literary works to improve or humanize the hearts of the characters. For example, in Hitchcock's Psycho, the character Norman believes that his murderous actions are preserving his heart's love for his mother. One of Poe's characters, Hop Frog, commits a murder of revenge for his own freedom and peace of heart.
This was the most helpful presentation for me in terms of progressing my own paper, which is an analysis of East of Eden. Because murder is such an important part of the original Cain and Abel story, it is also something that should be considered in this retelling. I loved the idea that murderous characters are trying to preserve or better a heart, whether their own or someone else's, since Cal's actions always come from a place of sincere desire to protect his own heart. This brought a new perspective to this book, which gives me other subjects to research.

Monday, March 14, 2016

Some Pre-Writing

I did some informal pre-writing as I started reacquainting myself with East of Eden. I started by talking with a good friend about her opinions on the book. It's one of her favorites but she hasn't read it in a while. Then I skimmed through the book and picked out a few key quotes. I was going to draw out some key elements of plot and setting, but I ended up drawing some of characters who, in my opinion, are the key characters (either for being interesting or influential).
I might use some of the other pre-writing techniques later in the writing process, like the idea cluster chart or the post-it notes.



Thursday, March 3, 2016

East of Eden

I've been thinking about researching East of Eden by John Steinbeck. This epic novel is significant for the literary world and for Steinbeck himself--it is one of his most important works. For him, this was a novel to teach everything he had learned about morality and humanity. It is a bold allegory based on the classical Biblical story of Cain and Abel and is shown over several generations.
I don't know what specific topic I'm going to write about yet, though there some excellent themes about agency and morality and fascinating characters. I'll be thinking about that over the next few days.

Some interested audiences may be:
Discussion board on Goodread for East of Eden
Book comments on Barnes and Noble or Amazon for East of Eden
Blogs such as: http://www.everythinghurts.me/blog/2016/2/6/a-story-of-our-pain-then-and-now
                        http://thewelltravelledlayne.blogspot.com/2016/02/favourites-from-book-club.html
Websites such as: http://www.steinbeck.org/ (for both Steinbeck and for East of Eden)
                            https://www.facebook.com/EastOfEdenTemporary/
                            https://www.facebook.com/John-Steinbeck-Author-262171857294892/?fref=nf
  My fellow book-nerd friends