Thursday, March 31, 2016

East of Eden Drafting: Take Two

Okay friends, this post needs a huge disclaimer: this draft is a complete and utter MESS. I had a weird headache and I was still mentally drafting (my bad for not planning ahead a little better...) so this is awful. I'm actually embarrassed to post it, haha. But please know that if the middle doesn't make any sense, it's not supposed to yet--I'm working on it :)

The concept of “timshel” is very valid and well-supported in this epic novel. It is the character of Lee, the Chinese immigrant who raises Adam’s twin boys Aron and Caleb, who goes by “Cal”. During his years of research on the Bible, Lee discovers that in the original Hebrew, the word given with God’s commands is “timshel,” meaning “thou mayest.” Lee then states that “[this] might be the most important word in the world. That says the way is open. That throws it right back on a man” to choose his own actions rather than being forced to do anything. (301) This is an empowering idea, as this allows all people to act freely, but it is also a responsibility and accountability for one’s own actions. No one is forced to do anything, so they must live with the consequences of whatever they choose to do. This is shown very poignantly in the final meeting of Cathy, then Kate, and her husband Adam. When Adam finds her in her prostitution house, Kate believes that, just as before, she can use manipulation to gain power of her former husband. But Adam chose to confront her and his feelings of love for her, and in doing so, he saw her as she truly was. He could not be fooled anymore and he was free to act. He even “laughed because he knew that [she didn’t matter]” to him anymore. (323) Parallel to his choices are Kate’s very purposeful actions. She chose again and again to lash out and hurt Adam as much as she could with her blackmail, her lies and affair, and her sexuality. But Adam realizes and declares to her that she “hate[s] the good in [others] that [she] can’t get at,” which is “something [that she] can’t understand.” (321) Yet even though she, as a sociopath, cannot understand goodness the way that others can, she still puts for real effort to ruin others. That is not just her nature—it is her conscious decision. She becomes bound by her horrible, selfish choices when she loses power over Adam and therefore can no longer make choices for them both in the situation.
            Yet there is a paradox, for even though every person has the ability to choose for themselves, they each have a unique drive that causes them to choose the things that they do. There is something that motivates each person that causes them to act differently from others, and this thing can be defining. When Adam is forced to think again about Cathy, he must choose how to respond. Lee tells him that even though he is facing a choice, “[his] course is drawn. What [he] will do is written—written in every breath [he’s] ever taken” (376). Human thought and habits are both consistent and persistent. It is difficult to break free of our usual thoughts processes and perceptions.
            Steinbeck seems to take this a step further as he suggests that our nurturing styles and interactions are influenced by our nature. As Adam thought back to his relationship with Cathy, he asked Samuel if she had truly even been beautiful like he had always thought. Samuel replied that “to [him] she was because [he] built her” (260). Adam has a pure heart and a good soul, and he saw these qualities in Cathy even though they were not there at all. He reflected himself onto her. Cathy did the same with her customers at her prostitution house; she insisted on reducing every man into an animal by seeing and exploiting only their flaws.
            Steinbeck does realize, however, that nature can be improved upon or ruined by one’s nurture. The character Samuel argues that although “You can’t make a race horse of a pig,” a person “can make a very fast pig” (260). He feels strongly that one’s children “will be what you expect of them.” There is a responsibility given to parents to encourage the very best in their children, if for no reason but to draw on the better parts of their nature.
            Embracing the best parts of one’s nature can be a very healthy process. Near the beginning of the story, the reader learns that Cathy began her rampage early in her life, when she realized that she took pleasure in other’s pain. When she was a teenager, she did many horrible things, including locking her parents and burning down the house with them inside. This is symbolic of Cathy rejecting her nurture and only embracing her own nature. Because she only chose the most evil parts of herself,

            But it is a person’s right to choose that course, whatever their reasoning, that Steinbeck so highly praises. He declares that he would “fight for” every person’s right to make their own decisions because “the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world.”  This is the thing that, above anything else, Steinbeck believes and wants others to know—that every person can and should make their own choices and should also rejoice in the fact that they can. He seems to find strength in the idea that we make our choices free of outside influences, even our nurture, as this takes away the most precious “freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected.” In this way we come to rely more on ourselves and our personal progress as we journey through life rather than be shaped by the circumstances and factors outside of our control. For Steinbeck, as shown in this epic novel, this is the crowning glory of mankind—to be one’s own person and make their own decisions for themselves.

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Improving by the Hour

As if to make up for the disaster that was my last attempt at timed writing for this piece, my process went so smoothly today!  I was really happy with how far I got.  Instead of looking at it as a monster paper that makes me want to hide under my bed, I broke it into bits.  Each point got its own Word Doc and I was able to stitch them together at the end of today.  Now, I just need to do the intro and conclusion and I'll have a pretty decent draft of this guy!

Here's what I've come up with:

Almost getting past the "thought blurps" now!

Here we go. One hour.

The way that Rowling is able to convey the frustration behind gender roles is in a way almost non-chelaunt. She never comes out and says that the way society views gender is wrong, but she alludes to this idea several times in each of the seven books in the series.

Another Successful Hour

So for this time around I decided to try Veronica's method of writing the Introduction and Conclusion and then filling in from there to make sure that my ideas would match up. So for this hour I really focused on solidifying those 2 paragraphs and I feel like they definitely show where I want my paper to go and so here's what I worked on that is in addition to the outline I made last time:


God or Man?
            Democritus, also known as the Laughing Philosopher, once said, “Happiness resides not in possessions, and not in gold, happiness dwells in the soul” [Brainy Quotes]. As a part of human nature, individuals are constantly looking for the source of happiness. Some look for happiness in others, some look for it in material goods, sometimes it is sought after in oneself. Others look for happiness in dreams, religious pursuits, and the divine. In The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck, the Joad’s- a family who has been affected by the Dust Bowl- are forced to migrate west. Along their journey they are constantly looking for ways to find happiness, whether it be through a son’s return, daughter’s pregnancy, or hope of a promised land. Unfortunately, every time the Joad’s put their faith in something, the outcome never is what they desire because it is based off of the powers of human nature. Their son is not able to save them, their daughter’s baby is a stillbirth, and the Promised Land is instead an overcrowded wasteland. Similarly to Steinbeck, Samuel Johnson explores the follies of human nature in The Vanity of Human Wishes. Johnson explores how pride, stubbornness, and worldly pursuits harm the progression of individuals because it is only through divine help that the vanities can be put aside and real progression can begin. As described in the Norton Anthology of English Literature’s introduction to Samuel Johnson’s The Vanity of Human Wishes, “ In a world of blindness and illusion, human beings must struggle to find a point of view that will not deceive them, and a happiness that can last” [Norton Anthology]. Although The Grapes of Wrath is perceived as a novel of triumph of the oppressed and a call for socialism, in actuality the novel exposes the vanities of human nature as described in The Vanity of Human Wishes and calls for a return to God for the betterment of society.

            BODY PARAGRAPHS

            The Grapes of Wrath shows the struggles that are a part of the nature of humanity and the vices that are described in The Vanity of Human Wishes. The novel exposes the follies of individuals placing their faith in humanity and hoping for things that no human could possibly fulfill. Through exposing human vices such as stubbornness, pride, and wishful thinking, as well as using Christ figures and using historical evidence, Steinbeck and Johnson call for a return to God and separating from the unreliable- human nature.

            

Another Hour of Writing: Testing at Hogwarts

I did the same type of drafting as last time but with a new subject that I want to have in my paper. I just kind of typed every thought I had about this area as soon as I had it. It will seem random and crazy and everything, but I felt like I got a lot of my brain goo into a tangible draft and it will help me organize myself this weekend! I didn't get everything I wanted, but I am getting somewhere! 

(Also, I think I spelled Weasley wrong like 8 times in here.... Please forgive me HP fanatics! I am only human!)

Thursday, March 24, 2016

East of Eden Writing

Next Steps and Draft

So, here we go. I will be using my annotated bibliography and some of the other sources that I've looked at, even just as references to keep me on-track. I have an idea of what paragraphs I want to write and a little bit of what I want to say. My goal: get my preliminary thoughts on paper. It will be a more skeletal draft than I'm used to writing, but it's a start.

Update
So I ended up with less sources and more thoughts, which I thought was fine for a super messy, preliminary write-up. I think I did get down my most basic outline, which was the goal. Again, sorry that it's so choppy:

            The concept of “timshel” is very valid and well-supported in this epic novel. It is the character of Lee, the Chinese immigrant who raises Adam’s twin boys Aron and Caleb, who goes by “Cal”. During his years of research on the Bible, Lee discovers that in the original Hebrew, the word given with God’s commands is “timshel,” meaning “thou mayest.” Lee then states that “[this] might be the most important word in the world. That says the way is open. That throws it right back on a man” to choose his own actions rather than being forced to do anything. (301) This is an empowering idea, as this allows all people to act freely, but it is also a responsibility and accountability for one’s own actions. No one is forced to do anything, so they must live with the consequences of whatever they choose to do. This is shown very poignantly in the final meeting of Cathy, then Kate, and her husband Adam. When Adam finds her in her prostitution house, Kate believes that, just as before, she can use manipulation to gain power of her former husband. But Adam chose to confront her and his feelings of love for her, and in doing so, he saw her as she truly was. He could not be fooled anymore and he was free to act. He even “laughed because he knew that [she didn’t matter]” to him anymore. (323) Parallel to his choices are Kate’s very purposeful actions. She chose again and again to lash out and hurt Adam as much as she could with her blackmail, her lies and affair, and her sexuality. But Adam realizes and declares to her that she “hate[s] the good in [others] that [she] can’t get at,” which is “something [that she] can’t understand.” (321) Yet even though she, as a sociopath, cannot understand goodness the way that others can, she still puts for real effort to ruin others. That is not just her nature—it is her conscious decision. She becomes bound by her horrible, selfish choices when she loses power over Adam and therefore can no longer make choices for them both in the situation.
            Yet there is a paradox, for even though every person has the ability to choose for themselves, they each have a unique drive that causes them to choose the things that they do. There is something that motivates each person that causes them to act differently from others, and this thing can be defining. When Adam is forced to think again about Cathy, he must choose how to respond. Lee tells him that even though he is facing a choice, “[his] course is drawn. What [he] will do is written—written in every breath [he’s] ever taken” (376). Human thought and habits are both consistent and persistent. It is difficult to break free of our usual thoughts processes and perceptions.

            But it is a person’s right to choose that course, whatever their reasoning, that Steinbeck so highly praises. He declares that he would “fight for” every person’s right to make their own decisions because “the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world.”  This is the thing that, above anything else, Steinbeck believes and wants others to know—that every person can and should make their own choices and should also rejoice in the fact that they can. He seems to find strength in the idea that we make our choices free of outside influences, even our nurture, as this takes away the most precious “freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected.” In this way we come to rely more on ourselves and our personal progress as we journey through life rather than be shaped by the circumstances and factors outside of our control. For Steinbeck, as shown in this epic novel, this is the crowning glory of mankind—to be one’s own person and make their own decisions for themselves.

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Drafting

I really liked the first time when we drafted by hand so that is what I did this time.  I will just post pictures of my drafts.  I didn't do the pre-drafting post but my goal was to establish a good opening paragraph and thesis that could drive my paper and then experiment with writing body paragraphs that were clear in supporting that thesis.

Pre-draft Plan: Harry Potter

Okay, super duper fast...

My plan for the draft is to basically start condensing all my post-y note annotations and my gathered sources into actual coherent sentences. It's going to be messy, and it's going to be a bit bumpy, but it's going to be fun. My first drafts are always a bit scatter-brained, but it's basically just getting the word vomit out and then arranging those words so that they start to turn into something. 

The discussion in class was super great because Kayla and I were going crazy with all the sources we'd found. There is so much information, the trick will be consolidating it. I'm excited to let off the brakes for one hour and just sort of fly down the mountain of information I've been stacking up.


Next Steps and Draft: Harry Potter

I'm actually excited to start writing! Sage and I had a great conversation about places we could go with our papers. We talked about exploring the different types of teachers there are and the comparisons we can make between them. Also, governmental involvement and its role and impact upon the education of Hogwarts.

 My plan for today is to just get as much as I can written in the hour of time I have. I want to write the entire time and, when I run out of something to say on a subject, move to the next thing. I imagine it may be jumbled, but my plan is to kind of see where it takes me.

Next steps and draft: Neverending Writing

Jonah and I discussed fantasy as I was exploring the roles fantasy plays in literacy, and more specifically the role of The Neverending Story. We talked about how fantasy doesn't get as much respect as it probably deserves for the role it plays. (Though in recent years, the position of fantasy as being looked down upon has changed a little bit.)
  •     My main goal for the hour is to get a really solid thesis hashed out. Especially because I'm still not entirely sure of the direction I would like to take.
  •     In brainstorm-fashion, I want to get sections written about the different aspects of the claim.
  •     If I have time, I will start threading them together, and organizing them.
  •     If I still have time, I will start fleshing these ideas out and pull in more research and examples. 
 

Annotated Bibliography


So. Long story short, Monday night I found out that someone had gotten a hold of my Amazon account and started buying all kinds of junk with my credit card information. I've spent the past two days in every level of you-know-where, so let's just skip ahead to the part where I finally upload that annotated bibliography and move on with the rest of my life. Sound good? Great. Let's go.

I Guess Now We Move On to Actually Writing the Thing

Based on what Rebekah and I discussed in class on Monday, I've got a fairly good idea of where to go with my paper. My thesis involves discussing paradoxes and contradictions in terms of each of the characters, but I'm also planning on analyzing the paradoxes of the environment they live in (the Congo under control of the Europeans, for example). My goals for today are to

Finalize the order of what I analyze
Figure out the best way to synthesize my sources together
Write at least a respectable portion of the rough draft, but hopefully all of it
Get in the right frame of mind to prepare to write the rest of the paper and drafts.

With luck, I'll get most or even all of these done during our writing hours!


Update:

Wow, that hour went by a lot faster than I thought it would. I only managed to get about halfway through the paper (of course, it's the rough draft, so the final product will most likely be even longer). But still, it helped so much to have this time to just plan out and write the paper! Here's what I have:

The Paradoxes of The Poisonwood Bible


Barbara Kingsolver’s The Poisonwood Bible has been hailed as many things: a symbol of female empowerment, criticism of the United States’ interference in the newly-formed Independent Republic of the Congo, and even an analysis of the destructive nature of religion. However, though all of these readings of her book have merit, none of them quite encapsulate everything that The Poisonwood Bible is as a whole. Kingsolver’s novel is not just a historical opinion piece set to fiction, or a feminist work, or any of these, though bits and pieces of them are quite prevalent within the text. Regardless of other readings and interpretations of the work, what The Poisonwood Bible contains at its very core are the themes of paradox, balance, and contradiction within both the individual and the environment they find themselves in. The book, to summarize briefly, documents the lives of the fictional Price family as they move to the Congo on a religious mission to convert the people of the village of Kilanga. It is narrated by each of the women in the Price family: the mother, Orleanna, and her four daughters, Rachel, Leah, Adah, and Ruth May. Each woman has her own inner paradoxes and conflicts, and some of them find balance in the Congo while others only find more disparity.
But what about the Congo itself? It and the village of Kilanga are a veritable hoard of paradoxes and contradictions, all of which somehow meld together into a balance unlike anything else seen in the world. The Congo the Prices find themselves is the country controlled by Belgium, a contradiction in and of itself, being an African nation ruled by a king in faraway Europe. Yet another paradox the Prices find themselves in is the paradox of prosperity. According to a 1962 history of the Belgian Congo written by George Martelli, during this time “the Congo embarked on a period of prosperity unequalled in any other African country.” (Martelli 205). And yet, to the Prices’ eyes, none of this prosperity is evident in Kilanga. Orleanna describes how the entire village subsists on enormous amounts of tubers called manioc, and almost nothing else (Kingsolver 92), indicating that none of this prosperity has come to the ordinary people. Indeed, Martelli explains that the wealth was mainly in the large cities of the Congo, where a quarter of the entire population lived. This left the other three quarters out in the dust, and yet, the people of Kilanga still remain despite their seeming lack of any kind of decent living. The paradox of this, that prosperity does not cause the majority of the population to prosper, adds to the deeper meaning of Kingsolver’s narrative by bringing to light the idea that sometimes one’s idea of happiness or prosperity is not needed for another.
Of course, each of the daughters has her own idea of happiness in an environment rocked by contradiction. Rachel, the oldest, exemplifies the kind of paradox that fuses two completely incompatible parts. She clings with a fury to the ideals and culture of America, and becomes a living paradox of a Western woman in an African nation. Rather than keep the balance the Congo has formed, she attempts to assimilate her own views of how people should act and be compared to one another, and yet at the same time keep herself aloof from the natives she finds all around her. Her inner paradox shapes her actions; where Leah finds herself almost at home within the activities and culture of the Congolese, Rachel purposefully excludes herself in a vain attempt to convince herself that nothing has changed. Roy Cook writes in his book Paradoxes that “they are in one sense nothing more than extremely clever puzzles,” (Cook 1) and Kingsolver’s purpose in these paradoxes is to give the reader a puzzle to solve, with the solution being a deeper understanding of Rachel as a character and as a common figure seen in society.

Leah Price, the second daughter of Orleanna and twin to Adah, exemplifies the concept of balance between two sides. Unlike Rachel, who simply refuses to accept her environment as natural, Leah dives right in and learns all she can. Thus we have the paradox of a white woman attempting to live in a black culture, but also the balance of Leah now part of two worlds. However, the balance is not omnipresent; Kingsolver brings in conflict to disrupt this balance in the form of Leah’s father, Nathan Price, in order to examine this balance more closely by breaking it apart. Leah’s actions are not viewed favorably by Nathan, and he attempts to pull her back to Western ways entirely. In her Master’s thesis discussing the resolution of conflicts within Kingsolver’s different books, Catherine Altmaier points out that, because of this, Leah is “both the most changed and the least changed” of the Price daughters (Altmaier 15). She refuses to accept her father’s view that their cultures are mutually exclusive, and when she finally escapes his tyranny, she says in her words that “I don’t know what has crept in to take his place... [Some] trust in Creation, which is made fresh daily and isn’t lost in translation.” (Kingsolver 525) Only once she escapes a paradoxical view of the world can Leah find her own balance of African and American.




Next Steps and Draft: The Grapes of Wrath

Okay so me and Courtney discussed my ideas and really talked about fleshing them out as well as figuring out the exact path I will go with for my paper. We talked a lot about Steinbeck's life and how it influenced his writing. There was also a ton of synopsis of each one off our stories so that we could understand each other's arguments and direction.
Here's my writing goal for today:
1. Flesh out ideas
2. Outline and structure argument
3. Start backing up ideas with research
4. Not freak out about a time limit!

See you in a couple of hours!

Update: So for the one hour of writing #anxietytime I got together my white board, quote guide I made for the Vanity of Human Wishes and all my sticky notes. First I divided everything up into sections and then I gave a brief summary of where I want it to go. Now all I have to do is fill it in with research and actually write the paper!

 Here's what my work looked like:

The Grapes of Wrath and Vanity of Human Wishes 
Introduction
            Hook: How are we exposed to our own follies? After we are exposed to the vanities of human nature, how do we react? Is this what causes change? If so, what change do we want it to or does it bring?
            Introduce the Claim: Begin with the Grapes of Wrath because it’s the main source. Joads, constant struggle, stupidity of humans continuing to hope. Then move onto The Vanity of Human Wishes as the second primary source (used on as a juxtaposition for the Grapes of Wrath). Laughing philosopher, vanities of all humans, letting vices take over virtues.
            Thesis: Although The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck, is perceived as a novel of triumph of the oppressed and a call for socialism, in actuality the novel exposes the vanities of human nature as described in Samuel Johnson's The Vanity of Human Wishes and calls for a return to God for the betterment of society.
            Evidence: See Body Paragraphs 1-

Body #1: Reason Vs. Stubbornness
            Grapes of Wrath: “But at last its legs waved in the air, reaching for something to pull it over.” (After almost being killed, the Turtle still gets back up and tries again… WHY?)
“If a man owns a little property, that property is him, it’s a part of him, and it’s like him.” (This is the reason why the turtle gets back up, because it feels like there is something worth fighting for… is this stubbornness or reason?
“For a moment he was about to walk on down the road, but instead he sat on the running board on the side away from the restaurant” or “But sometimes a guy’ll be a good guy even if some rich bastard makes him carry a sticker.” (It’s both! Reason and stubbornness. But I think in terms of this essay, I will argue stubbornness because of the fight that the people engage in.)
“Rose of Sharon loosened one side of the blanket and bared her breast. ‘You got to’ she said.” (Only reasonable thing! Not the best of options but needed for survival)
            Vanity of Human Wishes: “How rarely Reason guides the stubborn choice,/ Rules the bold hand, or prompts the supplicant voice/; How nations sink, by darling schemes oppressed,/ When Vengeance listens to the fool’s request.” (This is arguing the point of them being stubborn. The want vengeance, they want to rise up and live a good life without the demands of the government BUTTTT because they do it out of stubbornness, they will never get far!)

Body #2: Democritus
            The Grapes of Wrath: “You don’ know what you’re a-doin.” (Jim Casy, Christ figure, tells the police that they don’t know what they are doing, that they are judging the Okies, without even trying to understand. Crucifying the innocent.) “It’s all work” the preacher replied “They’s too much of it to split up to men’s or women’s work. You got stuff to do. Leave me to salt the meat.” (Casy talks about how silly we are to split things into men and women’s work. Vanity that there’s a difference and that we have to divide things up based off gender.) “There ain’t no sin and there ain’t no virtue. There’s just stuff people do. It’s all part of the same thing.” (Casy remarks on his philosophy of human nature, it’s not black or white or even gray. It’s any and everything.)
            The Vanity of Human Wishes: “Once more, Democritus, arise on earth,/ With cheerful wisdom and instructive mirth.” (Democritus and Casy are juxtaposition because they both are preaching the same things and looking at human nature from a different point of view,. BUTT go about it differently – laughing vs serious)

Body #3: Change
            The Grapes of Wrath: “ nobody can’t keep a turtle though.” (turtle is a symbol for the people, for time, for the world and basically you can’t stop it. You can’t stop progression and there’s only 3 options) “She saw the turtle and swung to the right, off the highway, the wheels screamed and a cloud of dust boiled up.” (Option A: Try to avoid it) “And now a truck approached and as it came near, the driver saw the turtle and swerved to hit it.” (Option B: Face it head on, or C- which I don’t have an exact quote for- try to keep pace/pick it up like Tom). “Times are changed, don’t you know.” (And you can choose one of those 3 options but either way it will continue to move forward.)
            The Vanity of Human Wishes: “Where change of favorites made no change of laws, And senates heard before they judged a cause.” (We want…. We don’t want… BUT we don’t want to put in the effort ourselves.)

Body #4: Power
            The Grapes of Wrath: “The bank- the monster has to have profits all the time. It can’t wait. It’ll die. No taxes go on. When the monster stops growing it dies.” “Men made it, but they can’t control it.” (Power is something we want in a pretty box with ribbon topped with a bow but really it’s uncontrollable and when we create something with power we are allowing that to take over because no human can control the force that drives it.)
            The Vanity of Human Wishes: “Claim leads to claim and power advances power.” (It’s a never-ending cycle. What do we do about it now?)

Body #5: People in Charge
            The Grapes of Wrath: “Some of the owner men were kind because they hated what they had to do, and some of them were angry because they hated to be cruel, and some of them were cold because they had long ago found that one could not be an owner unless one were cold.” (Sad life of being in charge, nothing you can do because POWER aka the monster is in charge and so these people HAVE to submit to its rule.)
            The Vanity of Human Wishes: “He views, and wonders that they please no more;/ Now pail the tasteless meats, and joyless wines,/ And luxury with her slave resigns.” (There comes to a point when being in power hits reality and it isn’t great anymore and so like the owners you have 3 options for how you can react… Which will you choose with the city lights become dull?)

Body #6: Education
            The Grapes of Wrath: “Mechanical engineering. It’s easy. Just study a few easy lessons at home.” (Oh how naïve! Is this how we view education and the educated? There is something more, promise!)
            The Vanity of Human Wishes: “Through all his veins the fever of the renown/ Burns from the strong contagion of the gown” “And Bacon’s mansion trembles o’er his head.” (it could all crumble, all the hard work, because that’s what it is, yet we still pursue it. It will burn in the end)

Body #7: Future Generations
            The Grapes of Wrath: “That lady that says I’ll lose the baby.” (What people do now, does have an effect on future generations.) “He guided the box gently out into the current and let it go” (Sometimes we have to let go and allow the future generations to decide what they want to do. (Raise a child in the way he or she should go and then let him/her decide where they will take it)
            The Vanity of Human Wishes: “from age to age in everlasting debt.” (What we do now will leave the future in debt. We won’t see  the consequences of our actions but rather we will see the consequences of the actions of those before us and the future will have to pay for what we have done, etc.)

Body #8: Second Coming/ Christ’s Reign
            The Grapes of Wrath: “She looked at Pa and Uncle John standing helplessly gazing at the sick man.” (We don’t know what to do without the Lord. We are helpless without him and so we need him to come back!) “And the two women looked deep into each other… She said, ‘Yes.’” (The women are live the servants of the Lord who understand his plan and know what needs to be done to help.)
            The Vanity of Human Wishes: “In life’s last scene what prodigies surprise,/ Fears of the brave, and follies of the wise!” “To Interest, Prudence, and to Flattery, Pride,/ Now Beauty falls betrayed, despised, distressed,/ And hissing Infamy proclaims the rest.” (Our wishes and thoughts are vain but heaven’s are not. The truth, beauty, and good. Things fall into place when God is on your side.)

Conclusion:
Wrap it up! Like a crunch wrap! JK, not really.

Ready...Break! (Next Steps and Draft: The Goose Girl)

After gathering a lot of information from databases and forming a rough thesis, I still don't know exactly where my paper is going to go or how it's going to flow (unintentional rhyme). So I'm pretty excited for the chance to be forced to sit down and just draft my paper in a specific, limited time frame.


My objective during writing from 3-4 is to get a rough draft on the basic points addressed below (not necessarily all of the supporting evidence/quotes behind them). Here is a rough outline of my paper:
  • Briefly introduce how Grimm bros fairytales stood the test of time because of the basic human problems/experiences/themes they address
  • Introduce the story of the Goose Girl (especially main character/how she progresses)
    • Could discuss how it works better as a book and how it wouldn't work well as a movie because so much of it happens in her head, you get to really understand the character)
  • Delve into the psychology behind developing personal identity
    • Show examples of how main character did those things
    • Discuss thinking errors that the main character shows (denial, fantasy, suppression, etc.)
  • Discuss mother/daughter bond and how that affects identity (psychologically)
    • Examples from book^
    • Could tie in other books/stories/movies that address similar issues (could have this in the beginning before directly addressing the goose girl?)
  • Wrap up 
Hopefully this rough draft works out well. I think I'm going to focus on just getting it written, so writing as much as I can without going back and deleting/editing too much (even if it sucks). I may even do this by hand just to be sure I focus on getting ideas out rather than on making the writing beautiful (although I still hope it won't be too atrocious). I'm pretty excited to write this paper and focus a lot on the psychology behind the main character's personality and actions!


Next Steps and Draft: Sylvie and Bruno~

Okay! So during my discussion with Justin in class, I came to the conclusion that I had a pretty good thesis for what I'm going for, and got even more excited about some sources I had been previously been dubious about. I realized that some of them, while I saw them as "far-fetched," may actually be really useful as clever counterarguments. Also, after talking to Justin about varied sources, I was even happier about a specific source on Lewis Carroll and Alice in Wonderland that I had found. I decided that the next bit I would work on would be outlining and drafting, like we did with our W;t essays, and so I was pretty grateful that we were actually assigned to do so. I have never really been very good at drafting in the past, but really loved how it worked out for me when I did it properly. Overall, I am actually kind of excited about this! Is that nerdy? Yes...that's nerdy.

Next Steps and Draft: The Yellow Wallpaper

I'm ready to just get this paper done, out of my system, and off of my to-do list!  A rough draft will be good to help me finally get everything organized and written out in cohesive ideas. Talking through my plans with Dr. Burton was so effective on Monday! He helped me realize that my initial ideas were..uhh...pretty cliche.  Soooo some revision was necessary.  Luckily, he showed me a different option that could also be great and pretty unique, so now my subject will be: "Women and Hysteria: Relating Mental Health and Women's Issues through the Lens of 'The Yellow Wallpaper.'" This isn't the title because it's not super engaging at all, but it's a start.

Monday, March 21, 2016

Annotated Bibliography: The Neverending Story


Working Thesis: Although many scholars dismiss The Neverending Story as fantasy geared toward children, it can play an important role for children in becoming literate.
I would really like to address the use of the alphabet and tie it into literacy (especially early literacy) though I'm not entirely sure how I'm going to do that yet.

East of Eden Bibliography

I honestly still have no idea what I want my thesis to be, but in my brainstorming and research, I focused primarily on Cal and Cathy and what we learn about morality from their characters.
       Because of this, my working thesis is: "The characters of Cal and Cathy shows that one's nature is more influential than one's nurture in making moral choices."

Sources:
(1) Segal, Nancy L. Born Together. N.p.: Harvard University Press, 2012. Web. 21 Mar. 2016. [Online Book]
This is a report on twin studies that looks at the similarities between habits and quality of life for twins separated at birth. It is a study that looks at "nature," and can be helpful in analyzing the character of Cal and looking at the theme of timshel--does he actually have a choice? This helps also in the analysis of Cathy's character and her antisocial personality.

(2) Sternberg, Robert J., and Elena L. Grigorenko. Environmental Effects on Cognitive Abilities. N.p.: Psychology Press, 2014. 40-43. Web. 21 Mar. 2016. [Online Book]
This source has information on child development, especially how families affect the mental growth of children and early teens. This is important for the character of Cal, who was raised in a very dysfunctional home and was therefore affected by his circumstances. This focuses, therefore, on "nurture."

(3) Cavarero, Adriana, Angelo Scola, and Margaret A. Groesbeck. Thou Shalt Not Kill: A Political and Theological Dialogue. N.p.: Fordham University Press, 2015. 7-10. Web. 21 Mar. 2016. [Online Book]
This is a good source because, obviously, it discusses the law of murder, particularly in relation to morality. This is a central idea in the original story of Cain and Abel, and it is important in understanding the parallels between the Biblical story and the versions shown in East of Eden, especially in relation to Cal's character.

(4) Verene, Donald P. "The Sociopath and the Ring of Gyges:: A Problem in Rhetorical and Moral Philosophy." Philosophy and Rhetoric 43.3: 201-21. Web. 3 Nov. 2010. [Journal Article]
I wanted to do some research on sociopaths since Cathy has so many sociopathic tendencies. This source was generic enough to be easily applied by specific enough to be helpful. This type of reserach is important in a further study of morality--if a person is hindered from understanding morality at all, is timshel still an applicable concept? How far do personal choices go? This will allow me to expand more on Cal's character as well.

(5) Montes, Maria J. "A Response to Ronald G. Alexander's 'Personal Identity and Self-Constitution' and Michael Goodman's 'A Sufficient Condition for Personhood'." The Personalist Forum 8.1 (1992): 91-96. Web. 21 Mar. 2016. [Journal Article]
This is another article about morality, though it is more an evaluation of morality in general as it applies to all people. This will also help me to further look into the idea of timshel and the morality of each of the characters, especially Cathy and Cal.

(6) The Holy Bible. Salt Lake City: n.p., 2003. 9-10. Web. 21 Mar. 2016. [Book]
This is the source of the original Cain and Abel story, which is clearly very important to the analysis of East of Eden. In order to understand the two versions of the story that Steinbeck presents, it is good to see the original views of morality and sin. I think this will help me most with Cal's character and analyzing his character through a moral lens.

Symposium Adventures

This was my first symposium and wow it was amazing!

The first thing I did was attend the Shakespeare session at 1215-115 on Thursday. Like Sage, I work and so my boss was cool enough to let me have the hour off, although I had to make up by staying later on Friday, but we will over look that for now haha

So for the Shakespeare session the first two papers really stuck out to me.
The first one a girl discussed the translation of Shakespeare in to movies, text messages, even into sign language. She argued that while there are many aspects of the beautiful language that are lost, the translations bring the universal themes into a new light and make them available to more people.
The second paper was written by a guy who chose to place Ophelia in a position of power. Instead of Ophelia being acted upon she was acting in her own way. She wasn't insane but rather moved past reason. It was brilliant and I loved how he shed new light on a character that gets so much crap most of the time!

Both of these papers I thought would work well with what I am arguing because they take the original mindset of the audience and flip it on its head. Their arguments made me really think and could be useful for keeping my paper from being boring and conforming to everyone eles's views on Steinbeck.

The other thing I did was I volunteered at the English Society's table during the symposium. It was super fun working at the table and getting a look into the behind the scenes.. PLUS during that time Michigan lost to Midd Tennessee which I mean who doesn't love a good Basketball game?

Check out the English Society FB page for more recaps of the Symposium!
https://www.facebook.com/byuenglishsociety/

Sources!

I always get so caught up in my research because sometimes it gets so much more interesting than the actual book... sometimes haha Whelp. Trying to stick close to my original plan here are my citations for the research I have done!

Thesis:
Although The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck, is perceived as a novel of triumph of the oppressed and a call for socialsim, in actuallity the novel exposes the vanities of human nature as described in Samuel Johnson's The Vanity of Human Wishes and calls for a return to God for the betterment of society.
Works Cited
Amis, G. T. "The Style Of The Vanity Of Human Wishes". Modern Language Quarterly 35.1 (1974): 16-29. Web. [online article]
This  article talks about the style in which Samuel Johnson wrote the Vanity of Human Wishes and how this style contributes to the power of Johnson's message. This article points out the pathos in Johnson's argument and how the emotion moves people -- Similarly to Steinbeck's appeal to pathos in The Grapes of Wrath .The sympathy the audience feels towards the Joads moves them towards reform and reevaluation of society-- like the poem does but in regards to the pathos that is created towards the people who are overtaken by the vices and lose their virtues. 
French, Warren G. A Companion To The Grapes Of Wrath. New York: Viking Press, 1963. Print. [book]
This book is a compilation of the who's who and the what's what of The Grapes of Wrath. It give geological information about the dust bowl, insight to book vs. movie adaptations, the way that it affected america back then and in the present day. It's a great overview of the basics that need to be understood for the first time reader and help give a new perspective after reading the novel a bunch of times .
Jackson, Joseph Henry, Carter Meredith, and A. A Milne. Why Steinbeck Wrote The Grapes Of Wrath. New York: Ltd. editions club, 1940. Print. [article]
This is a small book, tbh it's more like an article- literally it's 3 pages with binding, that discusses the reasons behind the novel. It tells about Steinbeck's life, his being drawn the the little man, and then the novel being taken as fact rather than fiction and how that grew the debate which can still be said is going on today. It discusses the reality of the duct bowl and the fiction of the novel.
"Johnson, Samuel". Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia 2015: 1. Web. 21 Mar. 2016. [encyclopedia]
The biography of Samuel Johnson that briefly outlines his life, works, etc. Short simple, dictionary                but gives the reader the info needed to know the basics of his life.
Meyers, Jeffrey. Samuel Johnson. New York: Basic Books, 2008. Print. [ebook]
This ebook is another biography of Johnson's life that goes into great detail about his disabilities, views, and works. It exposes the reader to his life, the lack of influence from his parents, the constant competition he was engaged in and finally his influence from then on out. Really helped me get another look into his life and why he wrote what he did and how I could tie in Steinbeck's life and both the poem and novel.
Millichap, Joseph R. "Biography Of John Steinbeck.". Critical Insights: The Grapes of Wrath (2010): 14-17. Web. 21 Mar. 2016. [ebook]
This is another biography that explains in simple terms how Steinbeck's upbringing in California contributed ot the novel and influenced his success throughout the years.
Noggle, James, Lawrence Lipking, and Stephen Greenblatt. The Norton Anthology Of English Literature. New York: W.W. Norton, 2012. Print. [primary source]
Samuel Johnson's The Vanity of Human Wishes
Owens, Louis. The Grapes Of Wrath. Boston: Twayne, 1989. Print. [book]
In this book Owens, describes Steinbeck's life by year, the influences of the bible and romantic era's, and the style of The Grapes of Wrath. This is very useful because I am comparing this to Johnson's poem which is around the same time period and they both have the same influences. This book also tells about how others perceive The Grapes of Wrath and the history behind the novel.
Steinbeck, John. The Grapes Of Wrath. New York: Penguin Group, 2002, Print. [primary source]
Da Book.
The Moral Philosophy of John Steinbeck; Ed. Stephen K. George. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 2005. 199 pp.
This book discusses Steinbeck's values and how they are portrayed in his books. Gives a great insight to the why he wrote things and a new perspective on The Grapes of Wrath in regards to his other works

WOW THAT TOOK 5EVER TO DO.

British Literature Symposium

The first paper gave me a lot of insight into how deeply you can look into the meaning of a book or play.  She went away from the standard interpretations of the play.  At first I was skeptical but by the end she almost had me convinced that her interpretation was right.  This is applicable to my paper, because my book has a very standardized interpretation, but I could try to pull a different, obscure meaning out of it if I wanted to.

The second presentation was about how the Sherlock Holmes character and story has changed over time and how it has become open for interpretation to any author.  It was interesting how she evaluated how the Sherlock Holmes stories have changed over time to match the desires fo the audience viewing it.  The part of her presentation that could apply to my paper was what she said about character development.  She basically said that once an author has created a character, the readers are able to interpret that character to be whatever they want it to be.  In my book, the author clearly wanted characters to be interpreted a certain way, but I, or any other reader, could interpret it however I want.

            The last paper was interesting because it discussed how people portray themselves versus how they are innately.  She talked about how masculinity changed in the Victorian Era and how this is reflected in a short periodical.  She talked about how men would change the way they acted in order to be viewed as more masculine. This is really applicable to my book.  In my book, the animals are acting in way that is not innately “animal.”  They are acting in a way that is against their nature in order to be perceived in a different way and to attain a goal.